Pastor's Blog >>

Genesis 1:1 vs. Hawking

September 07, 2010 by Pastor Jeremiah

The famed Physicist and writer, Stephen Hawking, has created a fire storm in the media with his new book “the Grand Design.”  In it, Hawking writes, “Because there are laws such as gravity, the Universe can and will create itself out of nothing. It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the Universe going."  While this is disappointing news for a person of faith such as myself, Hawking’s publishers couldn’t be happier.  It’s crazy statements like these that sell books.

Before now, Hawking was on the fence when it came to the divine inspiration of the universe.  He’s quoted as saying it may, or may not have been the result of God.  Now, he’s certain.  What’s to account for this sudden shift from agnosticism to atheism?  Apparently, it’s our ever expanding understanding of just how large the universe is that has convinced him.  While Hawking readily admits that there are many scientific discoveries that are “odd” and “difficult” to explain without accepting that God exists, he explains this all away with this simple mathematical formula.  Are you ready for this? He says: there are 100 + billions of universes and, out of these billions, one was bound to come up fine-tuned for life.

I’m no physicist, but I’m not that impressed with Hawking’s theory.  Are you ready to stake your eternity on a roll of the dice like that?  But Hawking doesn’t stop with dismissing the existence of God.  He’s ready to apply the reversal of this formula to prove the existence of E.T.  Case in point, on April 25, 2010 he stated in a story that ran in the London Times that since there are a 100+ billion galaxies in the universe it’s highly likely that life exists out there beyond the life on earth. He’s quoted as saying, “To my mathematical brain, the numbers alone make thinking about aliens perfectly rational.”

Ok, I loved Mr. Hawking’s cameo role in the Simpsons, but I’ve lost some respect for the man. How is belief in aliens justified as rational by the very same formula that proposes faith in God is irrational?  It’s just not rational Stephen.  What’s more perplexing to me is why Hawking would want to jump ship into the world of cold and heartless atheism.  It’s the compassion flowing through the belief that every life is sacred that has given him a chance in life.  If life is no longer sacred, but rather a frantic battle for self-preservation, would we maintain our efforts to ease the suffering of those facing life threatening disease and illness?  As it stands, his life is of inestimable value, after all Jesus died for Stephen Hawking just as he died for you and me.

 

Amber Bell says:

Recently, I have read quite a few interviews, commentary and online debates, regarding atheism. A majority of the atheists that I was listening to were in academia and specifically science. One person, a very prominent scientist and author, went so far as to say asking why the universe was created in the first place was stupid question and science doesn't act stupid questions. Mind you, the word 'stupid' is a direct quote. Are we willing to say that the greatest minds, not only of our time, but all time, in the fields of philosophy, history, archeology and even science, that have asked this question when face to face with irrefutable evidence or a matter of the heart, are....stupid?? What struck me even more so in their arguments was the total and complete denial of all academic genres outside of science? Namely, the work of countless historians and archeologists who have spent their entire careers examining humanity. Humanity and the human mind are so complex that while we understand the workings of the brain and our biology, for example, 'love hormones', we cannot say why we specifically fall deeply in love with and choose those that we spend our lives with. To understand 'us', respectively, you must take a look at our past. There quite simply are not answers to the human mind. The human mind that chooses love and forgiveness in the midst of suffering, torture, disease and the like. The human mind that chooses to spend a lifetime caring for a Quadriplegic instead of pursuing a brilliant career in academics and authorship after graduating from the countries top universities (one such professor I recently read about). And likewise, the minds of thousands of Jews who while carefully preserved their beliefs and customs, with their life (!), who suddenly in mass movements begin changing these customs and devoting their lives to a risen Christ. At the risk of being hunted, beaten, mocked, tortured and imprisoned. Doesn't quite sound like something my mind would do without evidence. History examines these things. History tells the story of humanity. With all do respect to our scientific scholars, to throughout all of human history is stupid. And history tells a shocking story of this amazing person, who defying all our understanding of what our world was capable of (as described in scientific terms), changed all of history, in three small years. If we only use science to describe these things, we are using the one thing that Christ overcame....isn't that shooting ourselves in the foot a bit?

Kyle says:

Hey J, I’m fascinated by science and cosmology. Mostly because I know that if it is indeed a quest for truth, they’ll eventually get around to God. I was struck at how the existence of a law of physics could prove that a creator was not necessary. I’m sure plenty of folks have wondered the same thing. How something physical (gravity), that can be measured by scientific method, could prove something beyond the realm of physics. As best I could understand (which ain’t sayin’ much) it’s all mathematical and based on a zero energy state of the universe. Gravity (negative energy) is equated to zero by matter (positive) energy. That, combined with the abstracts of dark matter and dark energy (hypothetical and as yet unproven), plus a string theory (hypothetical and as yet unproven) view of quantum physics led Mr. Hawking to this conclusion. I'm sure it all works on a 10' by 50' chalk board. Also, I think he may be the victim of a publisher that wants to sell more books and an English intelligencia in which atheism is all the rage. I found a youtube video that points out the philosophical problems much better than I could sum them up. you may have to cut and paste it into your browser. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-yx5WN4efo&feature=player_embedded

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.